HyperX SoloCast vs QuadCast – The Better Mic?

hyperx solocast vs quadcast
hyperx solocast vs quadcast

Since its launch in 2016, the HyperX QuadCast microphone has been hailed as one of the best affordable gaming headsets on the market. It’s comparable to many products at three times its price. But how does it stack up against its younger brother, the HyperX SoloCast? This article compares the two models to help you decide which one will work best for your needs and budget. We’ll start with an overview of each product, followed by an analysis of their features and specs, then we’ll wrap things up with an audio comparison.

Hyperx SoloCast vs QuadCast Comparison

There are plenty of differences between these 2 mics, that sets them apart. For an entry-level microphone, SoloCast does a good job when it’s stacked up against its bigger brother, here are the differences between HyperX SoloCast vs QuadCast.

When it comes to building quality, both the HyperX SoloCast and the QuadCast are well-built microphones. The SoloCast is made out of aluminium, while the QuadCast is made out of plastic. Both microphones are solid and feel like they will last a long time. However, the SoloCast does have a small advantage in this department because it is less likely to break if dropped.

On the other hand, the SoloCast has a higher chance of picking up background noise since it has no noise cancellation feature. In terms of their respective sound quality, both microphones are very similar with only slight differences between them. Which microphone is better? The answer depends on what you want out of your microphone. If you need something that won’t pick up background noise as easily and wants something more durable, then the SoloCast would be a good choice for you. If you’re looking for something that has slightly better sound quality and can handle high volumes without breaking, then the QuadCast might be the right choice for you.

When comparing the difference between the HyperX SoloCast and the QuadCast, it’s clear that both microphones are great for podcasting. The SoloCast has a bit more of a natural sound, while the QuadCast has a bit more of a studio-quality sound. If you’re looking for a microphone to use for gaming, the SoloCast is a great option.

If you’re looking for a microphone to use for music recording, the QuadCast is a great option. With its four different patterns i.e., figure 8, cardioid, omnidirectional, and bidirectional, this microphone is perfect for instruments such as guitars or drums. In addition to capturing these instruments well in solo mode, the QuadCast can also record multiple instruments in a quad mode without any signal loss!

Both are great options for podcasting, but they each have their unique features. The SoloCast is a USB microphone that offers plug-and-play convenience with no drivers required. It has a cardioid pickup pattern that minimizes background noise and focuses on your voice. The Quadcast, on the other hand, is a condenser microphone that requires a bit more setup. It has four different pickup patterns (cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo) so you can tailor your recording to your needs. It also has an LED indicator that lets you know when you’re being heard clearly. So, which one is right for you?


After comparing the HyperX SoloCast and QuadCast microphones, it’s clear that the QuadCast is the better option. Almost all of the differences work to the QuadCast’s advantage, however, when mounted on a boom arm, the devices operate similarly. QuadCast is more versatile, with four different pattern options, while the SoloCast only has one. It also has a built-in pop filter and shock mount, which the SoloCast does not have. Plus, it sounds better overall, with less background noise and a more natural sound. If you’re looking for a great microphone for your gaming setup, the QuadCast is the way to go.

With 4 pattern settings, an integrated pop filter, shock mount, and superior sound quality, this is an easy choice. But, if you invest in a boom arm, or a pop filter the sound quality comes close to QuadCast and it almost is identical. So, the competition is fierce but QuadCast without any other things takes the cake here. You may be interested in the QuadCast S if you are gravitating toward the QuadCast for aesthetic reasons. It has programmable RGB lighting.

Leave a Comment