If you are someone who often finds himself participating in voice chat, you will need to have a good microphone at your disposal. While the attached microphone in your headset should get you by, most of them offer poor quality which is why getting a dedicated microphone becomes a necessity. Though when it comes to choosing the right microphone, there are plenty of options to go. Speaking of which, two really popular options that players like to compare are the Blue Yeti Nano vs HyperX SoloCast. To learn more about these two products in detail, here are all the different aspects of the two devices that you should know about:
Blue Yeti Nano vs HyperX SoloCast Mic Comparison
1. First Look
Right out of the box, you will notice how both these microphones feature a completely different design while coming with an identical shape. While the Blue Yeti Nano takes a more sophisticated approach with the design which should look good with your gaming rig, we couldn’t help but notice the bolder design on the HyperX SoloCast.
Comparing the two against each other, we liked the way Blue Yeti Nano was built. However, it will simply come down to personal preference as to which microphone looks better for you. It is worth mentioning however that the HyperX SoloCast comes with a full black design, compared to the grey-ish color on the Blue Yeti Nano.
2. How do These Perform?
When it comes to actual performance, we were amazed at how well both these devices managed to perform. If you are only planning to participate in things like gaming voice chats, either of the two microphones should serve you quite well.
The Blue Yeti Nano could even be graded as an entry-level audio production level microphone. So, whether you are planning to stream, or just be a part of your game’s voice chat, both should get the job done for you.
Though if we were to compare the two, the Blue Yeti Nano wins here as it sounds much better than the HyperX SoloCast.
3. Taking An In-Depth Look at The Specifications
Coming down to the specifications of both these microphones, some of the benefits that you will get to enjoy with the Blue Yeti Nano is that it features a shock mount. Apart from that, you should also get a dedicated socket for a 3.5mm jack, along with a control panel that is placed on the device itself for better control over the microphone.
Furthermore, the Blue Yeti Nano has a 24bit audio interface as compared to the 16bit audio interface found on the HyperX SoloCast. In contrast, the HyperX SoloCast has an LED sound indicator that helps give a visual queue and is almost 200g lighter and 37mm smaller than the Blue Yeti Nano. Moreover, it’s thinner and narrower making it a much smaller device as compared to its counterpart.
But talking about the specifications on the sheet, there’s no benefit that you will get using the HyperX SoloCast when compared with Blue Yeti Nano.
4. Pricing
By now, you might be wondering that the Blue Yeti Nano is better in almost every aspect in contrast to the HyperX SoloCast. However, there’s a catch as the Blue Yeti Nano is much more expensive because of the added features and extra specifications that you get on the device.
As a result, users on a budget rather prefer going for the HyperX SoloCast.
The Bottom Line:
Comparing Blue Yeti Nano vs the HyperX SoloCast, both these microphones are solid options that you can choose. But if you wish to learn which one of them is the better fit, then we recommend that you go for the Blue Yeti Nano.
Even though this will cost you quite a few bucks, you will still be getting improvements in pretty much every single aspect. Though if budget is one of your major concerns, then the HyperX SoloCast should be a great option as well.